|
| No. |
Message |
Response |
| 1 |
Form a genuine sources it has come to the knowlwdge the VC and his team has assured the Fradulent emplyees who have been suspended and fired by the VC.that they would be compenseted by univ giving jobs to their other family members.Is it legal to reward or compensate on something illegal being done.The emplyees should be punished and on no moral or sympathetic law they should be allowed to go free.If the VC does it it shows that he too is sailing in the same boat where he expects that his kith and kin would get a job after he would be fired. what a gand bang!! |
This is only a rumour |
|
| 2 |
So, The AMU VC and Registrar finally learnt to take the High Court seriously---where as a few days ago they used to say--{Kya ho jayaga----bas ek aur mukadma lag jaiga hamare against!!!!!) -when his own neck was about to get hacked by Justice Arun\'s order!!!!
More andd more people should resort to appealing in the High Court---then and only then this AMU will get purge itself out of Hooliginism. All past VCs and Adm should also face the axe for allowing and encouraging this \"chamchagiri\' policy and using their \"discretionary power under Section 19-3-C\" , which should be curbed at the earliest.
Lest see the fun this VC faces after the 19th whn the Univ opens------he has bitten much more than he can chew -in too many fronts...........
(Akeel, Univ of Berkl-y--USA).
|
Hope the rule of law prevails! |
|
| 3 |
Whats this news about the dissmissal of 125 fradulently employed people in AMU directed to be dismissed by today the 10th july 2010----OR the VC to present and explain himself in the Allahabad H Court 0n the 12th?????
|
Yes the news is absolutely correct, but the matter could have been dealt with more dexterity |
|
| 4 |
no updates??? ..Is rti group still working?? |
The group is very active due to support from all its well wishers |
|
| 5 |
this site is being used as a blog by the visitors of this site. Now why r u talking abt axing and moderating the messages. Let them be published as it is as far as they are not carrying any vulgar comments. Whomsoever has written abt MR.(not worth of being called Dr.) Mujahid, what wrong has he written |
If everyone agrees we will keep publishing messages that will not sharply offend anyone. But if there is evidence provided we will publish even that |
|
