|
| No. |
Message |
Response |
| 1 |
CLARIFICATIONS SOUGHT BY AMU:
1. On 30-OCT-2006, Chairperson (Dr. Roshan Ara), Department of Philosophy, asked to put his signature on each page of the performa submitted on 30-OCT-2006 but he declined the request.
2. On 01-NOV-2006, Chairperson, Department of Philosophy, requested for copies of certificates/ degrees in support of information provided on perormace on 30-OCT-2006, which he declined.
3. On 02-NOV-2006, Chairperson, escalated the matter to the Registrar as Mr. Tariq Islam declined to provide any supporting documents.
4. On 14-DEC-2006, Registrar (Prof. Faizan Mustafa), sought clarification on this matter, within 15 days.
5. On 31-DEC-2007, Chairman (Mohammad Muqim), sought copies of all degrees and marksheet wrt assesment form for promotion as professor under CAS but he could not submit the required documents.
6. On 18-JAN-2008, Deputy Registrar Selection Committee sought clarification and asked him again to submit the proper marksheet within 15 days, to which he did not comply.
7. On 10-MAR-2008, Deputy Registrar Selection Committee sought clarification again and asked him to submit B.A. marksheet within one month. He could not comply.
8. On 11-FEB-2009, Registrar (Prof. V. K. Abdul Jaleel) asked to furnish information regarding the enrolment/registrat ion number in The Polytechnic of North London within 3 days.
|
Point 1 & 2 refers to information sought by the Registrar on directions of the VC for preparing data bank and did not require either signature on each page nor any documents; point 3 & 4 due reply was made to the Registrar and then there was silence; point 5 the documents required for CAS promotion were all attached with the proforma; point 6, 7 and 8 the Deputy Registrar has no authority to which a faculty has to comply, the requirement was provided to the Registrar on 01.03.09. |
|
| 2 |
SHOW CAUSE NOTICES:
1. On 28-APR-2008, Chairman, Department of Philosophy, wrote a letter to Mr. Tariq Islam and asked him to comply within 15 days to which he did not.
2. On 27-FEB-2009, Registrar, wrote a letter to Mr. Tariq Islam to explain his position within 2 days failing which necessary action will be taken as per university rules.
In absense of appropriate response from Mr. Tariq Islam, AMU contacted Peter Fisher, Records and Compliance officer, London Metropolitan University (previously The Polytechnic of North London), to which he mentioned the percentage is 46% with THIRD CLASS HONOURS. Below is important text from his letter to understand the context:
\"1. The 7 subjects SHOWN under \'SECOND YEAR\' were, in fact, each tought over a period of 2 years. Hence, it would have been more accurate (and certainly more helpful!) to have had these subjects listed under the Second AND Third years.
2. The results of resit examinations are shown in terms of the actual marks awarded to the resit papers. However, the regulations show that where resits were taken, the resulting marks were automatically capped at 35%, for the purpose of calculating the final degree classication. (NB: THe first year results did not count towards the final degress classification) .
Hence, the aggregrate mark for the Second and Third year work is 46% (48+61+35+45+ 63+35+35= 322, divided by 7 = 46%). This corresponded to a Third Class degree (falling, as it does, within the range 40-49%)\" From the letter of Peter Fisher dated 30-MAR-2009.
|
Point 1 never received the letter, have not specified what was required nor does the Chairman have any such authority, he should have reported the matter to the competent authorities; point 2 adequate reply was provided to the Vice Chancellor; point 3 Fishers letter is not a marksheet or transcript from which aggregate percentage can be worked out. Fisher's recent communique clearly states Dr. Tariq Islam has an aggregate percentage marks of 56.8% |
|
| 3 |
EMPLOYMENT FORMS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED BY MR. TARIQ ISLAM:
.
.
.
- On 24-NOV-1987, employment form for local selection committee for lecturership in which he recorded 56.8% marks and in the column of division: BLANK.
- On 16-DEC-1988, employment form for local selection committee for lecturership in which he recorded 56.83% marks and in the column of division: BLANK.
- On 25-OCT-1989, employment form for local selection committee for lecturership in which he recorded 56.4% marks and in the column of division: BLANK.
- On 16-AUG-1991, employment form for local selection committee for lecturership in which he recorded 56.8% marks and in the column of division: BLANK.
- On 01-OCT-1998, employment form for general selection committee for lecturership in which he recorded 56.8% marks and in the column of division: SECOND.
- On 22-JAN-2002, assesment form for senior scale lecturer under CAS scheme, in which he recorded 56.8% marks and in the column of division: BLANK.
- On 16-OCT-2003, employment form for general selection committee for the post of professor in which he recorded 56.8% marks and in the column of division: BLANK.
- On 30-OCT-2006, performa of data relating to teachers of the university in which he recorded 56.8% marks and in the column of division: SECOND.
- On 31-DEC-2007, assesment form for promotion as professor under CAS, in which he recorded 56.8% marks and in the column of division: BLANK.
Note:
1. Mr. Tariq Islam never mentioned Third Class Honours in any of the forms submitted by him (Concealment of Fact).
2. Mr. Tariq Islam never mentioned that he obtained 46% marks. (Concealment of Fact)
3. In all places he has mentioned 56.8% instead of 46% marks. (False Information)
4. In at least two forms he has mentioned his division to be second. (False Information)
|
Interestingly, the University has charged Dr. Tariq Islam of filling up all his employment forms with second division. However, it may be mentioned that Mr. Muqim and Dr. Islam both applied for promotion to professor under CAS and the University has rejected Mr. Muqim's form |
|
| 4 |
BACKGROUND:
1. On 28-Jun-1979, Council for National Academic Awards issued a certificate to Mr. Tariq Islam of The Polytechnic of North London that he has been awarded a degree of Bachelor of Arts with THIRD CLASS HONOURS. (Self Attested by Mr. Tariq Islam)
2. On 03-Jul-1984, Mr. P. G. Holiday, Registrar of The Polytechnic of North London issued a certificate that Mr. Islam got THIRD CLASS HONOURS. (Self Attested by Mr. Tariq Islam)
3. On 16-Feb-2009, Mr. Peter Fisher, Records and Compliance Officer issued a certificate that The Polytechnic of North London has awarded Mr. Tariq Islam a degree of Bachelor of Arts with THIRD CLASS HONOURS. (Self Attested by Mr. Tariq Islam)
4. On 30-Mar-2009, Mr. Peter Fisher responded to query submitted by AMU\'s registrar on Mr. Tariq Islam\'s percentage of marks in B.A., to which he informed that Mr. Tariq Islam received THIRD CLASS HONOURS with 46% marks.
5. On 13-Aug-2009, Mr. Peter Fisher responded to the Chairman of Department of Philosophy in which he certified that Mr. Tariq Islam received THIRD CLASS HONOURS with 46% marks and also issued the ceriticate for the same.
Note: Mr. Tariq Islam does not have a Master degree in Philosophy. However, he was granted admission at AMU to M.Phil. and Ph.D.
|
Mr. PG Holiday has clearly stated that class is a grade and not as is being confused here a division. Mr. Fishers letter is not a transcript/marksheet from which aggregate percentage of marks can be calculated. In more recent communiques Mr. Fisher has clearly stated that Dr. Tariq Islam has an aggregate percentage of 56.8% marks. The issue of equivalence of Dr. Tariq Islam's degree has been settled in his favour by the Supreme Court of India |
|
| 5 |
Prof Muqim has alleged Dr.tariq islam of forging his marksheet.his deatiled information on amu yahoo groups has sparked a great row among all. dr.tariq please reply to Prof.muqim\'s write up |
MR Muqim is neither a PROFESSOR and nor a PhD. As per UGC norms he can at best be Lecturer (Selection Grade)! AMU has submitted an affidavit before the Hon'ble High Court at Allahabad that they are soon going to take corrective steps and demote him to Lecturer (Selection Grade). The factually incorrect posting by Mr Muqim relating to Dr Tariq Islam on yahoo group at a time when an inquiry is in progress in the matter is a clear sign of desperation. Mr Muqim has conveniently forgotten to mention the landmark judgement of Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Dr Tariq Islam's matter. Moreover his hostility vis-à-vis Dr Tariq should also be seen in the light of the fact that recently AMU rejected Mr Muqim’s candidature for the post of Professor in Philosophy while Dr Tariq was found eligible for the same (AMU has admitted the same in an RTI reply!). MR Muqim very well knows that his game is soon going to be over as TRUTH shall prevail. Has anyone bothered to ask MR Muqim that as to why he does not have the courage to send print of the posting on yahoo group to AMU administration? |
|
|
|
|
|
